<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ShopFlick Wants to Be the Next Online QVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://videoretailer.org/commerce/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://videoretailer.org/commerce/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Intersection of Video and e-Commerce.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:31:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mega-Trend 2009: Live Video Shopping &#124; VideoRetailer.org - Exploring the Intersection of Video and e-Commerce.</title>
		<link>http://videoretailer.org/commerce/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mega-Trend 2009: Live Video Shopping &#124; VideoRetailer.org - Exploring the Intersection of Video and e-Commerce.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videoretailer.org/content/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] the video store for indie products, has recently launched online limited daily deals for online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the video store for indie products, has recently launched online limited daily deals for online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Foster</title>
		<link>http://videoretailer.org/commerce/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://videoretailer.org/content/shopflick-wants-to-be-the-next-online-qvc/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>This was exciting to read when I saw this company was funded.  I agree Shopflick will have a challenge but it looks like they&#039;re trying to position the company as a super-affiliate.  I have just a couple of bones with the site - don&#039;t want to sound too negative here as overall I think it&#039;s a cool idea and just might work:

1) Content is still sparse.  For example, when clicking on the &quot;Beauty&quot; category, I see a thumbnail for a &quot;puzzle stool&quot; next to a thumbnail for &quot;facial cleanser.&quot;  I can get the facial cleanser but a stool?  C&#039;mon. :-)  Looks like some content may be tagged hyper-broadly to make up for overall lack of content.  Still, I could see it growing over time.

2) Had a problem with launching checkout overlay with a video playing in the background - it eventually worked, but seemed very slow.

3) When trying to buy a product, I kept trying to click on the video, but that just paused the video.  The &quot;buy&quot; button is quite obvious on the page but I think this illustrates something about the user experience that is unique to video.  When watching the video, I want to interact directly with the video and go to the checkout page.  I&#039;m focused on the video - 100% - and the rest of the page just tunes out a bit.  I would be interested in seeing them do an A/B split of the conversion rates on identical videos with embedded links to the cart vs. placing these elements externally.

4) This is e-commerce design 101 but in Shopflick&#039;s eagerness to collect user accounts they are making a big mistake to require a user to create an account during the initial stage of the shopping cart.  The abandonment rate must be insanely high.

5) Even worse, there&#039;s a confirmed opt-in process during check-out for new accounts.  I come from the email world, and am all for confirmed opt-in as a way to promote strong deliverability and build trust, but by slicing the user experience during checkout into pre-confirmed to post-confirmed, Shopflick is killing sales which has got to be the kiss of death for a startup like this.  One thing to remember about video is that it is extremely effective at creating impulse buys.  That&#039;s because video can &#039;sell&#039; a product in ways images and text simply can not.  The further removed from the video I am as a shopper during checkout, the more I want to second guess my purchase decision before completing payment.  To make matters even worse, on clicking the confirm link, I&#039;m prompted to sign in again, not taken to the cart.  This is a process that definitely will need some fixing.

5) For the small seller, a 12.5% cut may not be much.  However, to really attract large advertisers to the site, I don&#039;t think this is going to cut it.  12.5% just seems too high, and for a startup seeking to be a super affiliate for videos, it sort of baffles me why they&#039;d price this way out of the gates.  I would think for a new startup the focus would be on attracting more content, but I guess it&#039;s more important for them to prove the model before the value (content) is really there.

Justin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was exciting to read when I saw this company was funded.  I agree Shopflick will have a challenge but it looks like they&#8217;re trying to position the company as a super-affiliate.  I have just a couple of bones with the site &#8211; don&#8217;t want to sound too negative here as overall I think it&#8217;s a cool idea and just might work:</p>
<p>1) Content is still sparse.  For example, when clicking on the &#8220;Beauty&#8221; category, I see a thumbnail for a &#8220;puzzle stool&#8221; next to a thumbnail for &#8220;facial cleanser.&#8221;  I can get the facial cleanser but a stool?  C&#8217;mon. <img src='http://videoretailer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Looks like some content may be tagged hyper-broadly to make up for overall lack of content.  Still, I could see it growing over time.</p>
<p>2) Had a problem with launching checkout overlay with a video playing in the background &#8211; it eventually worked, but seemed very slow.</p>
<p>3) When trying to buy a product, I kept trying to click on the video, but that just paused the video.  The &#8220;buy&#8221; button is quite obvious on the page but I think this illustrates something about the user experience that is unique to video.  When watching the video, I want to interact directly with the video and go to the checkout page.  I&#8217;m focused on the video &#8211; 100% &#8211; and the rest of the page just tunes out a bit.  I would be interested in seeing them do an A/B split of the conversion rates on identical videos with embedded links to the cart vs. placing these elements externally.</p>
<p>4) This is e-commerce design 101 but in Shopflick&#8217;s eagerness to collect user accounts they are making a big mistake to require a user to create an account during the initial stage of the shopping cart.  The abandonment rate must be insanely high.</p>
<p>5) Even worse, there&#8217;s a confirmed opt-in process during check-out for new accounts.  I come from the email world, and am all for confirmed opt-in as a way to promote strong deliverability and build trust, but by slicing the user experience during checkout into pre-confirmed to post-confirmed, Shopflick is killing sales which has got to be the kiss of death for a startup like this.  One thing to remember about video is that it is extremely effective at creating impulse buys.  That&#8217;s because video can &#8216;sell&#8217; a product in ways images and text simply can not.  The further removed from the video I am as a shopper during checkout, the more I want to second guess my purchase decision before completing payment.  To make matters even worse, on clicking the confirm link, I&#8217;m prompted to sign in again, not taken to the cart.  This is a process that definitely will need some fixing.</p>
<p>5) For the small seller, a 12.5% cut may not be much.  However, to really attract large advertisers to the site, I don&#8217;t think this is going to cut it.  12.5% just seems too high, and for a startup seeking to be a super affiliate for videos, it sort of baffles me why they&#8217;d price this way out of the gates.  I would think for a new startup the focus would be on attracting more content, but I guess it&#8217;s more important for them to prove the model before the value (content) is really there.</p>
<p>Justin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

