Why I don’t buy into the YouTube cannibalization theory for product videos

July 18th, 2010 Posted in online marketing, seo, video ecommerce, youtube by Xavier Casanova

Many retailers hope to significantly boost their product page PageRank by adding video to it - betting on the fact that Google favors pages with video embedded in their search algorithm. I have seen anecdotal evidence that it is indeed true - although no one has published a repeatable formula yet, SEO after all is more art than science.

Another common practice for retailers and manufacturers is to publish their videos to YouTube. If you ask around what is driving these marketers to share on YouTube, you’ll likely hear that a) YouTube is the second most popular search engine, b) It’s potentially a lot of traffic, and c) it doesn’t cost anything (free advertising).

On the flip side I have been hearing more and more recently about “product page SEO concerns” - when a video is published to both the product page, and to YouTube. The argument usually goes like this - “I’ve read somewhere that Google favors video by inflating PageRank, resulting in up to a 50x boost in search engine visibility” (whatever that means). “So if I put my video on YouTube, the risk of the YouTube outranking my own product page is high - bumping my position on the SERP down. That’s why we stopped pushing videos to YouTube”.

The cannibalization story is certainly believable and the explanation makes sense if indeed Google has some bias to artificially inflate the PageRank of pages with video. At the same time, I have observed that the most successful retailers with video usually have a very
aggressive YouTube strategy, where every piece of content is pushed to YouTube, without evidence of SEO cannibalization. In fact, the perception among these successful retailers is that YouTube provided an extra SEO boost - and here is why.

1) YouTube is a massive backlink magnet, because so many sites, blogs, articles point it. Its PageRank is high - but more important, since YouTube appends any outbound link with rel=”nofollow”, the PageRank credit of a YouTube page is only spread across other YouTube pages. It’s like an echo chamber.

2) If a YouTube page is linked from a site with a high PageRank, it’ll benefit not only that page, but any related videos that are linked from it. In other words, the related videos on YouTube get a “free PageRank credit”.

3) As a retailer, if your videos appear as related to popular videos, they might start showing high on a SERP because their PageRank is high.

4) High PageRank means more visibility on Google, which may result in third part sites finding and linking to the retail site, sometimes directly to the product page.

videoseo_videoretailer-org

With this hypothesis there isn’t a cannibalization risk, because when the retailer pushes a product video to YouTube it is not at the expense of the product page, rather, it earns free credit from YouTube. Perhaps a more appropriate term to understand what is really happening would be “incremental free SEO” from YouTube.

In essence publishing e-commerce videos to YouTube in addition to the adequate product page is something I would consider a must. Important also would be to properly tag the video in YouTube and append a good description, since the key to success is to appear as often as possible as a related video in YouTube.



» Want to be featured on VideoRetailer.org? Suggest a Site Now.


6 Responses to “Why I don’t buy into the YouTube cannibalization theory for product videos”

  1. Jochen Bast Says:

    Hi Xavier,
    I totally follow your article and your explanations. But what strikes me most is the question if your sales will really increase by having a video of your product on YouTube?
    I believe that only a small amount of people find their way from YouTube to your shop, but maybe enough to make videos on YouTube a MUST.
    I’m wondering when the YouTube people add an “Add to Cart” button to their pages for products. Small shops register with YouTube like they do at Amazon and YouTube eventually becomes a shop with millions of product videos.



  2. Xavier Casanova Says:

    Jochen, I agree. As a side note, the fraction of people starting a purchasing process from a YouTube page might be small right now, but as product videos are added over time to YouTube, and as users start to recognize that it’s viable place to do some product research we should see YouTube becoming an important channel for eMarketers. On the “add to cart” button question, have you heard good feedback from their program with media companies?



  3. The Video Commerce Consortium » Blog Archive » Does YouTube cannibalize product page SEO? Says:

    [...] to their own business goals? ReelSEO’s Mark Robertson shares his thoughts about the “YouTube cannibalization theory,” and offers some valuable tips for “hosted and posted” video [...]



  4. YouTube & E-Commerce – Does Uploading Product Videos To YouTube Cannibalize SEO? Says:

    [...] to e-commerce business goals? ReelSEO’s Mark Robertson shares his thoughts about the “YouTube cannibalization theory,” and offers some valuable tips for “hosted and posted” video strategies. Mark [...]



  5. YouTube & E-Commerce – Does Uploading Product Videos To YouTube Cannibalize SEO? « As I see it… Says:

    [...] to e-commerce business goals? ReelSEO’s Mark Robertson shares his thoughts about the “YouTube cannibalization theory,” and offers some valuable tips for “hosted and posted” video strategies. Mark [...]



  6. Does YouTube cannibalize product page SEO? - Topseotutorials.com Says:

    [...] to their own business goals? ReelSEO’s Mark Robertson shares his thoughts about the “YouTube cannibalization theory,” and offers some valuable tips for “hosted and posted” video [...]



Leave a Reply